Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN, J
Hussain Mohammad Son Of Shri Pyar Mohammad – Appellant
Versus
Tolaram Son Of Shri Mohan Lal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sameer Jain, J.
1. Since the instant batch of petitions raises common questions of law and fact, and in view of the consent accorded by the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, all the petitions are being heard conjointly and are being disposed of by means of this common judgment, to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and to ensure judicial economy.
2. The principal as well as incidental reliefs sought by the petitioners in the present set of petitions relate to the issuance of appropriate directions for consolidation and joint investigation of all thirteen First Information Reports (hereinafter referred to as the 'impugned FIRs'). The petitioners have prayed that the said FIRs be clubbed and the investigation thereof be entrusted to a single investigative agency functioning under the supervision of an Indian Police Service (IPS) officer, who is posted in any district of the State of Rajasthan, excluding the districts of Baran and Jhalawar. The petitioners have further prayed that any additional FIRs, if registered in connection with the same subject matter, be also transferred to and investigated by the said authority to ensure consistency and impartiality
The court ruled that multiple FIRs against the same individual, based on distinct allegations, cannot be clubbed for investigation, emphasizing the need for thorough investigation into serious econom....
Malicious prosecution claims must show prima facie cases are unfounded; mere political allegations do not suffice to quash FIRs without substantive evidence.
The court emphasized the necessity of clubbing related FIRs for a unified investigation to prevent conflicting outcomes and ensure justice.
Point of Law : The concept is of 'same offence' under Article 20(2) and section 300 Cr.PC. In case distinct offences are being committed there has to be independent trial for each of such offence bas....
Writ petition for transfer of investigation and quashing of FIRs dismissed as registration is mandated by law; prior protection does not prevent new FIRs.
The court ruled that distinct allegations in a second FIR, even involving some overlap with a prior complaint, do not invalidate the subsequent investigation process, affirming the principle of judic....
Multiple FIRs alleging identical offences cannot be consolidated if they arise from distinct transactions involving different complainants and evidence.
The court emphasized the specific nature of the offenses under different State enactments and recent judgments in declining to grant the relief sought by the petitioner under Article 32 of the Consti....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
