IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
Amar Singh S/o. Ramsukh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The appellant has filed the present criminal appeal being aggrieved by the judgment dt. 27.11.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Churu in Sessions Case No. 67/2018 whereby, the trial court acquitted the respondents from offence under Section 3(1)(r)(s) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the complainant appellant submitted a complaint against the repsondents stating therein that the accused persons lured the appellant to sell his piece of land with the allurement of getting him remuneration from the Government. The accused persons obtained black signed documents and after forging documents, demanded money from him. It was alleged that the accused persons hurled caste abuses in front of other persons.
3. On the basis of said complaint, the learned Magistrate conducted an investigation under Section 200 and 202 Cr.P.C and took cognizance against the accused persons. Thereafter, charges were framed were framed against the respondents for offence under Section 3(1)(r)(s) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
4. The prosecution in support of its case examined five witnesses an
An acquittal under the SC/ST Act can only be overturned if the appellate court finds compelling reasons, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the necessity of substantial evidence.
An acquittal can only be overturned if the trial court's decision is unreasonable or contrary to the evidence presented.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal due to insufficient evidence under the SC/ST Act, emphasizing the presumption of innocence.
The judgment emphasized the need for substantial and compelling reasons to interfere with an order of acquittal, the double presumption of innocence in favor of the accused, and the importance of re-....
An acquittal should not be disturbed unless compelling reasons exist, maintaining the presumption of innocence.
Interference in acquittal requires compelling reasons; the presumption of innocence is reinforced by acquittal.
The judgment emphasizes the need for compelling circumstances and the perversity of the lower court's decision to interfere with an order of acquittal, citing specific cases to support the legal prin....
The court upheld the acquittal due to insufficient evidence, emphasizing the need for compelling reasons to overturn such judgments.
In appeals against acquittal, the appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and only interfere if the trial court's decision is unreasonable or perverse.
The presumption of innocence in favor of the accused is reinforced by the trial court's acquittal, and appellate courts should only interfere with an order of acquittal in exceptional cases with comp....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.