Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 1931

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT, J.
Shyam Sunder Sharma S/o Tejraj Ji - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2998 Of 2017
Decided On : 17-07-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Shreedhar Purohit Mr. Ramsukh Mali Ms. Shivani Mutha Mr. Anupam Vyas
For the Respondents: Mr. Hanuman Prajapati, PP Mr. Paras Soni, Add. S.P., ACB. O.P. Jodhpur Rural

The case lacks sufficient content for a definitive legal principle or outcome to be established.

Headnote:(A) Not applicable.

(B) Not applicable.

Facts of the case:
The appellant, Shyam Sunder Sharma, sought a remedy against the State of Rajasthan in this criminal miscellaneous petition.

Findings of Court:
The judgment does not specify findings in detail due to the absence of substantial content in the provided text.

Issues: The main issue pertains to the appeal filed by the appellant against the State of Rajasthan.

Ratio Decidendi: No specific legal reasoning or analysis is available in the provided text.

Result: The judgment does not provide a clear result due to insufficient content.

ORDER :

YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT, J.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge

Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :