Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 1931

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT, J.
Shyam Sunder Sharma S/o Tejraj Ji - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2998 Of 2017
Decided On : 17-07-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Shreedhar Purohit Mr. Ramsukh Mali Ms. Shivani Mutha Mr. Anupam Vyas
For the Respondents: Mr. Hanuman Prajapati, PP Mr. Paras Soni, Add. S.P., ACB. O.P. Jodhpur Rural

The case lacks sufficient content for a definitive legal principle or outcome to be established.

Headnote:(A) Not applicable.

(B) Not applicable.

Facts of the case:
The appellant, Shyam Sunder Sharma, sought a remedy against the State of Rajasthan in this criminal miscellaneous petition.

Findings of Court:
The judgment does not specify findings in detail due to the absence of substantial content in the provided text.

Issues: The main issue pertains to the appeal filed by the appellant against the State of Rajasthan.

Ratio Decidendi: No specific legal reasoning or analysis is available in the provided text.

Result: The judgment does not provide a clear result due to insufficient content.

ORDER :

YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT, J.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

SupremeToday Portrait Ad