Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
GANESH RAM MEENA
Jagdish S/o Shri Bhorya – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Kumar Meena S/o Shri Kailash Meena – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant filed for temporary injunction based on ownership claim. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for and against the temporary injunction motion. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. court's assessment of prima facie case and balance of convenience. (Para 10 , 12 , 20) |
| 4. challenge to the validity of the gift deed based on fraud. (Para 13 , 18) |
| 5. appeal dismissed; order regarding third-party rights maintained. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
Order :
GANESH RAM MEENA, J.
1. This civil misc. appeal has been filed by the plaintiff/appellant under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure with the prayer to quash and set aside the order dated 09.07.2024 passed by the Court of learned Addl. District Judge No.10, Jaipur Metropolitan-I (Headquarter Sanganer) [for short ‘the learned court below’] in T.I. Application No.101/2024, Jagdish Vs. Manoj Kumar Meena & Ors., and to allow the application for temporary injunction filed by him and also to restrain the defendants to maintain the status quo regarding the suit property bearing Khasra No.482/2013.
2. The facts borne out from the pleadings are that the plaintiff/appellant on 24.06.2024 filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the
In temporary injunction applications, the balance of convenience and irreparable loss must guide the decision, especially when one party has already made significant investments based on legal docume....
The court established that a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and risk of irreparable loss must be assessed when considering a temporary injunction application.
The main legal point established is the application of the principles of granting interlocutory injunction, emphasizing the need to protect the plaintiff against irreparable injury and injustice.
Court could not have come into finding that there was a balance of convenience in not granting an injunction.
The court emphasized the importance of establishing a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable loss when considering the grant of injunction in property disputes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of prima facie case, irreparable injury, and balance of convenience in deciding on temporary injunction. The judgment also highlig....
The court established that the criteria for granting a temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC must be strictly adhered to, emphasizing the necessity of a prima facie case and the....
A plaintiff must establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable loss to warrant a temporary injunction, and courts cannot grant relief beyond what is sought in pleadings.
An order being passed ex-parte thereby granting an injunction in favour of the petitioner thereby directing that the respondent shall not carry out the operation of the petrol pump till further order....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
