IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR
ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Dheersingh S/o Sanwataram – Appellant
Versus
Rajkaur W/o Guljharilal – Respondent
ORDER :
1. A challenge has been led to the impugned judgment dated 07.06.2022 passed by the Board of Revenue, Ajmer (for short, “the Board”) by which the judgment and decree dated 15.01.2018 passed by the Revenue Appellate Authority (for short “the RAA’) has been quashed and set-aside and the matter has been remanded back to the RAA to decide the first appeal strictly in compliance with the provisions contained under Order 41 Rule 31 of the CPC.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a suit for declaration and partition was filed by the respondents against the petitioners before the Court of Sub-Divisional Officer, Buhana (for short “the SDO”) and the same was decreed vide judgment dated 20.06.2016 against which a first appeal under Section 223 of the RAJASTHAN TENANCY ACT , 1955 (for short, “the Act of 1955”) was filed by the petitioners, after considering the entire facts, material, evidence and documents available on record, the RAA passed a reasoned and cogent judgment allowing the appeal.
3. Counsel submits that a second appeal, against the order dated 10.02.2018, was preferred by the respondents, before the Board and the same was partly allowed and the judgment pa
G. Amalorpavam and Ors. Vs. R.C. Diocese of Madurai and Ors.
Shasidhar and Ors. Vs. Ashwani Uma Mathad and Anr.
Malluru Mallappa (Dead) through Legal Representatives Vs. Kuruvathappa and Ors.
Mandatory compliance with procedural requirements under Order 41 Rule 31 of the CPC is essential for valid appellate judgments; non-compliance renders decisions unsustainable.
The appellate court must adhere to Order 41 Rule 31 CPC, ensuring all points of determination are addressed with reasoned judgments.
Mandatory compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Code for the First Appellate Court to independently assess evidence, frame points for consideration, and decide the appeal in accorda....
The First Appellate Court must frame points for determination and provide reasoned judgments, as mandated by Section 96 and Order 41 Rule 31 CPC.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory compliance of Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. and the Bombay Civil Manual by the First Appellate Court while deciding the appeal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory compliance of Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. by the First Appellate Court while deciding the appeal, and the requirement for the Appellat....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory compliance of Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. by the First Appellate Court, emphasizing the need for independent assessment of evidence, f....
The First Appellate Court must comply with the provisions of Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. by independently assessing the evidence, formulating specific points for determination, and giving reasons for ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory compliance of Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C., the requirement for the appellate court to independently assess the evidence, and the need ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory compliance of Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. by the First Appellate Court while deciding the appeal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.