Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
SAMEER JAIN
Dr. Syed Shabaz S/o Farooq Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. admission procedures and service bond details. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. petitioner's claims based on similar case judgments. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. state's arguments against the petitioner's claims. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. court's analysis on judicial discipline and previous judgments. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 5. final ruling on petitions and applications for review. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
Judgment :
SAMEER JAIN, J.
1. Registry is directed to connect all these cases together.
2. The defects, pointed out by the Registry in the applications filed by the respondent-State for recalling/review of the orders passed by this Court, are overruled.
3. Since, the present writ petitions as well as the applications filed by the respondent-State for recalling/review of the order(s) passed by this Court involve common question of law, as such, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same are taken up for final disposal together and are being heard and decided by this common order. Consequently, considering the fact that the writ petitions warrant adjudication on common questions of law and fact; with the consent of learned counsel a
Retention of original documents as a admission precondition is lawful under service bond agreements, and courts must observe judicial discipline in similar cases.
The court established that withholding original documents post-completion of a course is illegal unless explicitly permitted by the terms of a service bond.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
