Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Hemant Agarwal, Deepak Puri Goswami
For the Respondent: Vivek Choudhary

Certainly. Based on the provided legal document, here are the key points summarized:

1. The court emphasized the fundamental right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution, affirming that this right protects individuals in live-in relationships against threats from family members, regardless of their age or marriage eligibility [judgement_subject] (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) .

2. The right to choose a partner and live together is recognized as a fundamental right, and such relationships are not illegal. The court underscored that living together without marriage, even if one party is below the legal marriageable age, is protected under constitutional rights [judgement_subject] (!) (!) (!) (!) .

3. The case involved adults who wished to live together in a romantic relationship but faced threats and opposition from their families. They sought protection from the authorities, which the court directed to verify threats and provide necessary protection [facts] (!) (!) .

4. The legal framework stipulates minimum ages for marriage, but the court clarified that the right to live together in a consensual relationship is separate from the validity of marriage. Even if one party is below the prescribed age for marriage, their right to live in a relationship remains protected (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) .

5. The court highlighted that protection under Article 21 extends to individuals in live-in relationships, regardless of the legal status of their relationship or marriage eligibility, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding personal liberty and life (!) (!) (!) (!) .

6. The court directed authorities to verify threats and ensure protection for the petitioners, reiterating the obligation of the state to uphold citizens' rights to life and liberty (!) .

7. The court clarified that the observations made in the order are solely for the purpose of disposing of the case and do not impact any ongoing criminal or civil proceedings against the petitioners (!) .

These points encapsulate the court's stance on protecting the rights of individuals in live-in relationships, emphasizing constitutional protections and the importance of safeguarding personal liberty irrespective of age or marital status.