2026 Supreme(Raj) 142

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, CHANDRA SHEKHAR SHARMA, JJ.
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Pappuram S/o Dhukalram – Respondent
D.B. Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 14 of 2026
Decided On : 22-01-2026

The High Court holds constitutional authority to protect fundamental rights but must exercise judicial review judiciously, refraining from substituting its discretion in administrative matters.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Powers of High Court in granting writs - The High Court has the authority to issue directions, orders, or writs necessary for the enforcement of fundamental rights and for any other purpose. (Para 4)

(B) Judicial review - Scope and limitations - The scope of judicial review allows the High Court to examine the legality of actions taken by lower courts and administrative authorities but does not extend to substituting its own views on matters of policy or discretion. (Paras 5 and 6)

(C) Violation of rights - Key concern of the court - A fundamental right's infringement must be evidently demonstrable for the High Court to intervene in individual cases. (Para 7)

Facts of the case:
The appellant challenged an order impacting his fundamental rights, claiming procedural irregularities and violation of natural justice.

Findings of Court:
The court reaffirmed its role in protecting fundamental rights within the bounds of constitutional provisions.

Issues: The main issues addressed included the extent of judicial review powers and the threshold for interference by the High Court in administrative decisions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that while it holds the authority to review decisions, it must be cautious not to overreach its jurisdiction and must focus on safeguarding fundamental rights without indulging in matters best left to the discretion of authorities.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Click Here to Read the rest of this document