SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 2437

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
FARJAND ALI, J.
Dr. Udai Kumar Sharma, S/o. Shri SK. Sharma – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan, through the Secretary – Respondent 
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11938 of 2015 
Decided On : 11-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Manoj Bhandari, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Ojas Gupta
For the Respondent: Mr. A.K. Rajvanshy

Retirees are entitled to claim interest on delayed payment of retiral benefits, emphasizing constitutional rights and established judicial precedents.

Headnote:(A) Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India - Retiral benefits - Interest on delayed payment - Petition for direction to grant interest on delayed payment of retiral benefits (gratuity, commutation, leave encashment) at 6% per annum - Delay in payment not attributable to petitioner; inherent rights entitled to interest - Judicial precedents established entitlement to interest on delayed payment of retiral dues. (Paras 12, 15, 16)

(B) Delay and laches - Arguments by the respondents on delay in filing the writ petition dismissed; cause of action was continuing due to admitted delay in payment. (Paras 11, 14)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner retired as Associate Professor on 31.07.2008 but faced delays in receiving revised pension, gratuity, and leave encashment after the introduction of the 6th Pay Commission. The total amount claimed for interest on delayed payments is Rs.3.63 lacs, based on prior judgments affirming such entitlement.

Findings of Court:
The court determined the entitlement to interest for delayed payment of retiral benefits, specific to the circumstances and precedence of similar cases.

Issues: The primary issues included entitlement to interest on delayed retiral benefits and the implications of delay and laches raised by respondents.

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed that retirees are entitled to interest on delayed payments of retiral dues, emphasizing rights under the Constitution and prior court judgments affirming similar cases.

Result: Writ petition allowed, respondents directed to pay interest at 6% per annum on outstanding amounts.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's retired benefits and pay scale revision. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6)
2. arguments regarding delayed interest payments. (Para 5 , 7 , 8)
3. court's examination of undisputed facts. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. legal precedent on timely payment of retiral benefits. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. court's directive for payment of interest on delayed dues. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)

Order :

FARJAND ALI, J.

1. The petitioner, who has retired from the post of Associate Professor in Mathematics and Statistics from the Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, has preferred the instant writ petition seeking a direction for the respondents to grant him interest on the delayed payment of retiral benefits, i.e. arrears of commutation, leave encashment and gratuity, at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of retirement till the date of payment, which comes to Rs.3.63 lacs.

2. Briefly stated, facts of the case are that the petitioner is retired Associate Professors in Mathematics & Statistics of Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur. He retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation w.e.f. 31st July, 2008.

3. The State of Rajasthan introduced 6th Pay Commission and accordingly the Governor of Rajasthan revised the existing scales of pay of the Vice-Chancellor, Professors, Readers/Associate Professors and Assistant Professors / Librarians etc and this was done w.e.f. 01.01.2006. In this regard, order was passed by the Education Department of Government of Rajasthan on 27.10.2009, which was communicated to the Vice-Chancellor of the respondent University.

4. Prior to retirement of the petitioner, the benefit of 6th Pay Commission was ordered to be granted to him but no payment of arrears were released to him. His fixation. was also made under the 6th Pay Commission w.e.f. 1st January, 2006 in the pay scale of Rs. 37400-67000, but he was not paid the arrears. After his retirement, he was also not issued the revised Pension Payment Order as well as gratuity. The benefits of Leave Encashment, commutation of pay were also not paid in accordance with the Revised Pay Scale under the 6th Pay Commission.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy has already been set at rest by the Division Bench of this court in the case in DB Civil Writ Petition No. 1914/2010 titled as Retired Agriculture Lecturers Employees of Agriculture University V/s State of Rajasthan & Ors, decided on 24.9.2010, whereby it has been directed that the arrears of 6th Pay Commission and consequential benefits should be paid to all the retired employees along with the interest @ 6% per annum. Subsequently, it has further been reiterated in the case of B.M. Chitlangi V/s State of Rajasthan & Ors, In SB Civil Writ Petition No. 11927/2010 decided on 19.4.2011 wherein same benefit has been ordered to all the incumbents of Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur and the retired employees and for that purpose, the University as well as the State of Rajasthan were directed to release the funds for the purpose of making payment of all the arrears to the petitioners arising out of fixation under the implemention of recommendations of the of the 6th Pay Commission within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed in the case of Retired Agriculture Lecturers Employees of Agriculture University (supra).

6. Pursuant to these orders, the petitioner was granted certain benefits but the payments were granted to him after a delay of certain period of time. So far as the gratuity is concerned, he was to be paid 10 lacs of Gratuity as on 01.08.2008 but the entire payment of Gratuity was released only on 20.10.2011. Some payment was released in the year 2009, but the entire payment was released on 20.10.2011. Therefore, the interest has to accrue on the payment of gratuity to the extent of approximately 1.52 lacs. Similarly commutation of pension has been paid after a delay of almost two years. Leave encashment and arrear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top