HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
FARJAND ALI, J.
Dr. Udai Kumar Sharma, S/o. Shri SK. Sharma – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan, through the Secretary – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11938 of 2015
Decided On : 11-11-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's retired benefits and pay scale revision. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding delayed interest payments. (Para 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's examination of undisputed facts. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. legal precedent on timely payment of retiral benefits. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. court's directive for payment of interest on delayed dues. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
Order :
FARJAND ALI, J.
1. The petitioner, who has retired from the post of Associate Professor in Mathematics and Statistics from the Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, has preferred the instant writ petition seeking a direction for the respondents to grant him interest on the delayed payment of retiral benefits, i.e. arrears of commutation, leave encashment and gratuity, at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of retirement till the date of payment, which comes to Rs.3.63 lacs.
2. Briefly stated, facts of the case are that the petitioner is retired Associate Professors in Mathematics & Statistics of Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur. He retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation w.e.f. 31st July, 2008.
3. The State of Rajasthan introduced 6th Pay Commission and accordingly the Governor of Rajasthan revised the existing scales of pay of the Vice-Chancellor, Professors, Readers/Associate Professors and Assistant Professors / Librarians etc and this was done w.e.f. 01.01.2006. In this regard, order was passed by the Education Department of Government of Rajasthan on 27.10.2009, which was communicated to the Vice-Chancellor of the respondent University.
4. Prior to retirement of the petitioner, the benefit of 6th Pay Commission was ordered to be granted to him but no payment of arrears were released to him. His fixation. was also made under the 6th Pay Commission w.e.f. 1st January, 2006 in the pay scale of Rs. 37400-67000, but he was not paid the arrears. After his retirement, he was also not issued the revised Pension Payment Order as well as gratuity. The benefits of Leave Encashment, commutation of pay were also not paid in accordance with the Revised Pay Scale under the 6th Pay Commission.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy has already been set at rest by the Division Bench of this court in the case in DB Civil Writ Petition No. 1914/2010 titled as Retired Agriculture Lecturers Employees of Agriculture University V/s State of Rajasthan & Ors, decided on 24.9.2010, whereby it has been directed that the arrears of 6th Pay Commission and consequential benefits should be paid to all the retired employees along with the interest @ 6% per annum. Subsequently, it has further been reiterated in the case of B.M. Chitlangi V/s State of Rajasthan & Ors, In SB Civil Writ Petition No. 11927/2010 decided on 19.4.2011 wherein same benefit has been ordered to all the incumbents of Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur and the retired employees and for that purpose, the University as well as the State of Rajasthan were directed to release the funds for the purpose of making payment of all the arrears to the petitioners arising out of fixation under the implemention of recommendations of the of the 6th Pay Commission within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed in the case of Retired Agriculture Lecturers Employees of Agriculture University (supra).
6. Pursuant to these orders, the petitioner was granted certain benefits but the payments were granted to him after a delay of certain period of time. So far as the gratuity is concerned, he was to be paid 10 lacs of Gratuity as on 01.08.2008 but the entire payment of Gratuity was released only on 20.10.2011. Some payment was released in the year 2009, but the entire payment was released on 20.10.2011. Therefore, the interest has to accrue on the payment of gratuity to the extent of approximately 1.52 lacs. Similarly commutation of pension has been paid after a delay of almost two years. Leave encashment and arrear
Retirees are entitled to claim interest on delayed payment of retiral benefits, emphasizing constitutional rights and established judicial precedents.
Retiral benefits, including gratuity and pension, constitute vested property rights under Article 300A; delayed payment breaches the right to livelihood under Article 21, and employers must timely se....
Pension and gratuity are rights of employees, mandating timely payment, with penalties for unjustified delays in disbursement.
Arbitrary delay in disbursement of retiral benefits violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, necessitating judicial directions for timely payment and interest on delayed amounts.
Public servants are entitled to interest on delayed payment of retiral benefits if the delay is attributable to the State.
A government servant exonerated from inquiry is entitled to interest on delayed retiral benefits as per the applicable rules.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.