Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ANAND SHARMA
Mahboob Khan, S/o. Shri Anna Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan through P.P. – Respondent
ORDER :
ANAND SHARMA, J.
1. Facts of this petition would reveal that the manner, in which criminal law is being misused in a matter of purely civil nature just to exert undue pressure and to wreak vengeance.
2. Petitioner has challenged FIR No.174/2015 dated 08.10.2015 registered at Police Station-Mangaliawas, District- Ajmer for offence under Sections 420 , 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC .
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the fundamental dispute is in respect of land bearing Khasra No.561, Village- Amargarh, District-Ajmer. Erstwhile, Khatedar of the aforesaid land was complainant-Beeja. The complainant executed one registered sale deed dated 30.12.1985 in favour of Sh. Gulab Chand. It was mentioned in the sale deed that while executing the same, the vendor/complainant-Beeja has received sale consideration and handed over possession of the land to purchaser-Sh. Gulab Chand. Till this date, the said sale deed dated 30.12.1985 is a legal and valid document and has not been cancelled or quashed by any Competent Court or any other appropriate Authority. Further, pursuant to aforesaid sale deed, necessary mutation order was passed by the Revenue Authorities and n
The court established that criminal proceedings cannot be used to settle civil disputes, emphasizing that the FIR lacked allegations constituting a criminal offence and should be quashed.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that for an act to constitute an offence under Section 420 of the Penal Code, there must be fraudulent or dishonest inducement, and the absence ....
Criminal prosecution cannot arise from a breach of contract; such grievances are solely civil in nature, thus warranting quashing of the FIR.
Cheating and forgery – A bonafide criminal prosecution cannot be quashed at threshold.
Civil disputes can involve criminal elements; thus, the existence of a civil remedy does not automatically justify quashing a criminal FIR.
Civil disputes should not be converted into criminal cases; FIR quashed as allegations did not constitute an offense and indicated mala fides.
Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC do not permit quashing proceedings when prima facie evidence of a crime is present, mandating a trial to ascertain truth.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
