Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Raj) 271

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Ashutosh Kumar, J.
Hariram Yogi S/o Sh. Badrilal – Petitioner
Versus
Devilal Meena S/o Sh. Ramjilal Meena – Respondent
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1810 of 2023
Decided On : 13-05-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Lakshaya Sharma, Adv. with Ms. Pratibha Sharma, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Chanderdeep Singh Jodha, Adv.

An appellate court will only interfere with an order of the trial court if it is found to be perverse, illegal, or lacking in judicial discretion; mere possibility of a different view does not constitute valid grounds for reversal in civil appeals.

Headnote:(A) Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Order 41, Rule 1 - Scope of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal - Appellate jurisdiction over lower court orders - The Court examined the challenge to the order passed by the trial court. Appellate courts are tasked with evaluating whether the discretion exercised by the lower court suffered from any patent illegality, perversity, or failure to exercise jurisdiction vested in it by law. Reappreciation of evidence for facts already settled is generally avoided unless the findings are perverse or unsupported by the material on record. (Paras 1-5)

Facts of the case:
An appeal was preferred against an order passed by the trial court in a civil matter. The appellant challenged the underlying judicial order, citing grievances regarding the interpretation of factual and legal components of the dispute.

Findings of Court:
The Court reviewed the merits of the contention raised. The findings focused on whether the impugned order met the threshold of judicial propriety and legal correctness. The reasoning prioritized the established record and the trial court's application of relevant procedural law.

Issues: The main issue was whether the lower court’s impugned order was legally sustainable or required an appellate intervention due to an error in the application of law or material irregularity.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that there is no error in the exercise of discretion by the lower court that warrants interference in the appellate jurisdiction of the High Court. The impugned order aligns with the requirements of procedural and substantive equity.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2026 Supreme(Raj) 271

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPURAshutosh Kumar, J.Hariram Yogi S/o Sh. Badrilal – PetitionerVersusDevilal Meena S/o Sh. Ramjilal Meena – RespondentS.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1810 of 2023Decided On : 13-05-2026

An appellate court will only interfere with an order of the trial court if it is found to be perverse, illegal, or lacking in judicial discretion; mere possibility of a different view does not constitute valid grounds for reversal in civil appeals.

Related Judgments

HARIRAM YOGI S/O SH. BADRILAL vs DEVILAL MEENA S/O SH. RAMJILAL MEENA - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 18905

SMT. PAPPI DEVI W/O LATE SUMRANSINGH vs SANDESH S/O RAMDAYAL JAT R/O BAJNAKALAN - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 18901

B RUKMANI AND ORS vs IKRAH GRAH AND ORS - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 18838

RAM SINGH SON OF SHRI RAMKARAN vs FAREED SON OF SHRI KAMAL KHAN - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 18907

RADHEYSHYAM S/O SHRI HARIRAM vs NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 18903

Ashutosh Dwivedi, S/o. Rajeshwar Prasad Dwivedi vs Aditi Dwivedi, W/o. Ashutosh Dwivedi - 2026 Supreme(Chh) 145

National Insurance Company Ltd., through Regional Manager vs Aarti, W/o. Late Sanwar Lal - 2025 Supreme(Raj) 2369

United India Insurance Company Ltd., Through Its Authorized Signatory vs Manju Kanwar, W/o. Late Shri Shivraj Singh - 2025 Supreme(Raj) 2356

Prakash Chand, S/o. Shri Mala Ram Gurjar vs Moolchand, S/o. Shri Chanda Ram - 2025 Supreme(Raj) 2349

Rampat, Wife of Late Shri Lakhuwa vs Ramcharan Son of Shri Nathuwa - 2025 Supreme(Raj) 2361

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Ashutosh Kumar, J.
Hariram Yogi S/o Sh. Badrilal – Petitioner
Versus
Devilal Meena S/o Sh. Ramjilal Meena – Respondent
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1810 of 2023
Decided On : 13-05-2026