Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
SAMEER JAIN
State Of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Advent Envirocare Technology Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SAMEER JAIN, J.
1. In the present batch of writ petitions, the scope of the controversy involved, albeit not limited to but is broadly and predominantly defined by the challenge raised against the order dated 14.02.2025 passed by Jaipur Metropolitan-II, Jaipur in Execution Petition No. 1604/2023 (CIS No. 1643/2023) titled M/S. Advent Envirocare Technology Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Sanganer Enviro Project Development Jaipur, thereby accepting the alternate prayer of the award holder and issuing several directions which are absolutely sans authority of law and having disastrous consequences. Consequently, considering the fact that the writ petitions warrant adjudication on common questions of law and fact; with the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the parties, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6884/2025 titled as State of Rajasthan and Anr. v. M/S Advent Envirocare Technology Ovt. Ltd. & Anr., is being taken up as the lead case. It is cautiously clarified that any discrepancies in the present batch of writ petitions, pertain purely to the factual narratives contained therein and not vis-a-vis the questions of law to be determined by this Court; the instant judgment sh
A money decree against a corporation cannot be executed against its directors or employees unless they are personally liable; the corporate veil protects individuals from personal liability for corpo....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to implead Directors in their personal capacity for the attachment of personal property in execution and the inapplicability of the....
Order XXI Rule 37 of CPC provides that when an application is filed in execution proceedings for payment of money seeking arrest and civil imprisonment of judgment debtor, court would issue a notice ....
Directors of a company cannot be held personally liable for the company's debts unless explicitly stated in the decree.
Parties challenging an arbitral award must do so exclusively under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act; raising new grounds or objections in execution proceedings is impermissible.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
