SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Raj) 730

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, SANJEET PUROHIT, JJ.
Ankit Kumar Meena S/o Narayan Lal Meena - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Local Self, Govt. Of Rajasthan – Respondent 
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3118 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11117 of 2022, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 874 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8781 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15765 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 700 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4831 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13334 of 2019, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11112 of 2022, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3748 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4872 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5131 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8470 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23310 of 2025
Decided On : 05-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Moti Singh Mr. Siddharth Mewara Mr. Ramawtar Singh Dr. Pratishtha Dave Mr. Pranjul Mehta Mr. Sharad Kothari (through VC) Mr. Nikhil Dungawat Mr. Abhishek Pareek Mr. Ripudaman Singh
For the Respondent: Mr. Ayush Gehlot for Mr. Rajesh Panwar, AAG Mr. Pawan Bharti for Mr. I.R. Choudhary, AAG Mr. Anurag Shukla Mr. Arpit Samariya & Mr. Ram Awtar Sikhwal, AGC for Mr. Nathu Singh Rathore, AAG

JUDGMENT :

Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.

Scheduled Areas are constitutionally protected, but not constitutionally frozen.

1. The present batch of writ petitions namely, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3118/2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11117/2022, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 874/2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8781/2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15765/2025, D.B. Civil Petition No. 700/2025, D.B. Civil Petition No. 4831/2024, D.B. Civil Petition No. 13334/2019, D.B. Civil Petition No. 11112/2022, D.B. Civil Petition No. 3748/2024, D.B. Civil Petition No. 4872/2024, D.B. Civil Petition No.5131/2024, D.B. Civil Petition No. 8470/2024, reserved on 25.11.2025 and D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23310/2025 reserved on 18.12.2025, assail the legality, validity and constitutional permissibility of Notifications issued by the State Government. By the said notifications, the State, while purporting to exercise powers under Section 3 read with Section 329 of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 2009’), has, inter alia, included the Scheduled Area of various villages/gram panchayats within the territorial limits of the Municipal Corporation. Due to the commonality of assailment, the writ petitions mentioned hereinabove are being decided together.

1.1. At the outset, for the sake of brevity and convenience, in the present adjudication, a tabular chart depicting the particulars regarding the assailment herein, is as follows:

1.2. Since all the instant writ petitions arise out of a common controversy, though with minor variations in individual factual settings, this Court considers it appropriate, for the purpose of analogous adjudication, to treat D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 874/2025 (Gram Panchayat Balicha, Panchayat Samiti Girva, District Udaipur through its Sarpanch Smt. Laxmi Bai Gameti v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) as the lead case. Accordingly, the factual matrix, prayers and legal submissions are being noticed with reference to the said lead petition. The submissions advanced by the parties and the findings recorded herein shall, unless otherwise specifically indicated, govern and apply to all the connected writ petitions.

1.3. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 874/2025 (Gram Panchayat Balicha, Panchayat Samiti Girva, District Udaipur through its Sarpanch Smt. Laxmi Bai Gameti v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) was filed claiming the following reliefs:

“It is therefore most humbly prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed.

That by an appropriate writ, order and direction be issued and the notification dated 17.06.2022 issued by is Excellency Hon’ble governor of the Rajasthan (Annexure- 5), may kindly be declare highly illegal;, unconstitutional and same may kindly be quashed and set aside.

That by an appropriate writ, order and direction be issued and the declaration may kindly be made that the provision of Rajasthan Municipal Act, 2009 is not applicable in the area specified under the 5th Schedule of the Constitution of India as called TSP Area of the State of Rajasthan.

That the any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit to protect and maintained the healthy judicial system in State of Rajasthan , by which the petitioner may get full justice may also be allowed.”

2. The present controversy, insofar as it concerns Village Balicha, arises from the issuance of the impugned Notification dated 26.12.2024 by the State Government, whereby Revenue Village Balicha, falling within Gram Panchayat Balicha, Panchayat Samiti Girva, District Udaipur, was brought within the territorial limits of the Udaipur Municipal Corporation in purported exercise of powers under Section 3 read with Section 329 of the Act of 2009. Significantly, Village Balicha stands expressly notified as a Scheduled Area under the Scheduled Areas (State of Rajasthan) Order, 2018 (Constitution Order No. 270) issued under Article 244(1) of the Constitution of India, and its scheduled status is thus constitutionally secured and undi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top