SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(HP) 58

VYOM PRAKASH GUPTA, T.U.MEHTA
JAI PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
JAGDAMBA PARSAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For appellant :Shri Inder Singh. Advocate, For respondents:Shri S. S. Ahuja, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

T. U. Mehta, C. J. (Oral).—The appellant Jai Parkash Sharma had filed a private complaint against the respondents Nos. J, 2 and 3 for the alleged offences punishable under sections 323 and 5t6 of the Indian Penal Code, in the court of the Magistrate First Class, Bilaspur. The incident which is referred to in the complaint is said to have taken place about six years ago, i.e. on 6th October, 1973 at 10.30 A. M. According to the complainant, respondents 1, 2 and 3 had caught him and had given "blows on his body with an electric-type hunter".

2. After the process was issued, the matter came up before the learned Magistrate on 18-12-1973 when the complainant Jai Parkash was present in person and the respondents Nos. 1 and 3, Jagdamba Prasad and Mata Prasad, were also present in person. However, the respondent No. 2 Shakti Prasad was net present and the summons which were issued to him was also not received back, served or unserved. The court, therefore, ordered that fresh address of respondent Shakti Prasad be filed and he may be summoned on the next date which was fixed for 7th January, 1974.

3. The matter was taken up for hearing on 7-1-1974 when the court found that the compl
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top