J.P.GUPTA
SALO – Appellant
Versus
MUNSHI RAM – Respondent
V. P. Gupta, J.—Munshi Ram respondent No. 1 (hereinafter the plaintiff) filed a suit for declaration to the effect that he is the owner in possession of the land measuring 1 kanal and 17 marlas comprising khasra No. 50 of Tika Upahu Mauza Ladwara Tehsil Kangra, as detailed in the plaint (hereinafter called the suit land) with trees including an anjan tree situate in the suit land with a permanent injunction against Salo petitioner (hereinafter defendant No. 1) and respondents No. 2 to 5 (hereinafter defendants Nos. 2 to 5) to the effect that the defendants should not interfere with the plaintiffs rights in any manner whatsoever and should not cut or remove the trees from the suit land.
2. The plaintiff alleges that he is the owner of the suit land along with the trees by way of gift and that the defendants have no concern with the land and the trees. It is further alleged that the defendants are threatening to interfere with the plaintiffs rights and are also trying to cut or remove the trees forcibly from the suit land. The defendants inspire of the repeated requests are not stooping from their illegal activities of interference and the plaintiff is compelled to file the pr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.