SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(HP) 20

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh
LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA,K.C.SOOD
IAN ROYLANCE STILLMAN - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.327 of 200l1
Decided On : 01/11/2002

Advocates Appeared:
M/s. P.K. Mutneja, Deepak Gupta and Chandranarayan Singh, Advocates, for the Appellant; Mr. M.S. Guleria, Dy. A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Assistant Advocate General, for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Kuldip Chand Sood, J.—Appellant Ian Roylance Stillman, hereinafter referred to as "the accused", is a British National. He was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Kullu for the offence punishable under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, hereinafter referred to as "the Act", and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of rupees one lakh. In case of default in the payment of fine, the accused is to suffer further imprisonment for one year. Aggrieved, the accused is in appeal.

2. The prosecution case was: Assistant Sub Inspector Parma Nand (PW 12) along with other Police Officers, including Head Constable Yoginder Pal (PW 3), Constable Lai Singh (PW 4), Constable Kuldip Singh and Home Guard Officials Ghanshyam and Des Raj, was on routine preventive patrol on August 28, 2000. He set up a "naka" on the National Highway-21 near "Sood Petrol Pump" at about 1.15 a.m. He had checked two vehicles, a truck and gypsy when at about 1.20 a.m., Maruti Van HP-01-0313 appeared from Kullu side. The vehicle was stopped for checking. The van was being driven by Rajesh Negi (PW 1). Bir Singh (PW 2), companion of the Driver was occupying the front seat. "Accused" was found sitting on the back seat of the van. It was found by the Police Party that accused had kept a bag by his side on the seat. Assistant Sub Inspector Parma Nand suspected that the accused may be carrying some contraband and, accordingly, after enquiring his identity, he expressed his desire to search his bag which he had kept by his side. He informed the accused that he has a right to be searched in the presence of a Magistrate or Gazetted Officer and also asked if he was willing to give his search to the Police. The accused, vide Memorandum Exhibit PW2/ A gave it in writing that he is willing to give his search to the Police. The bag of the accused was searched and from the search, 20.300 kgms. of charas in the shape of tablets and sticks was recovered. Three samples of 25 gms. each were separately taken and sealed separately with seal T by the Investigating Officer. The remaining charas was put in the same bag which was sealed in a packet with the same seal. The specimen of the seal Ext. PW12/A was taken and seal was handed over to Yoginder Pal (PW 3). Seizure Memo Exhibit PW2/C was prepared which was also signed by the witnesses and accused. Memo Exhibit PW2/C was sent to the Police Station, Manali, through constable Lai Singh, for registration of the case. On the basis of this Memo, First Information Report Exhibit PW8/A was recorded by Inspector-SHO Bhupinder Singh Negi (PW8). The accused was arrested and informed of the grounds of his arrest. A separate Memorandum for the articles, other than charas, recovered from the bag was prepared in terms of Exhibit PW12/C. The van was seized vide Memo Exhibit PW1/ A. Other documents, including the passport of the accused, were also taken into possession by the Police. Accused informed that he was staying at% "Dragon Guest House Manali". His room in the Guest House was searched by the Police but nothing incriminating was found. It is the case of the prosecution that the charas so recovered and sealed along with the sample packets was handed over to Bhupinder Singh SHO Police Station, Manali by Assistant Sub Inspector Parma Nand, who also sealed the same with his own seal and deposited the case property in the Malkhana for safe custody. A report was prepared by ASI Parma Nand and sent to the Superintendent of Police, Kullu, through Constable Tej Ram in compliance to the provisions of Section 57 of the Act.

3. The defence of the accused was that he has falsely been implicated. The accused set up a case that another passenger, an Israeli National, was traveling with him in the van and the incriminating bag belonged to that Israeli National. It is the case of the "accused" that when the van was stopped on the Police signal of the Police party, the Israeli National o

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top