M.R. Verma, J.—A question about the maintainability of the present revision petition has arisen and this order is meant to dispose of such question.

2. The admitted facts relevant for the determination of the aforesaid question are that respondent Karam Dei (hereafter referred to as R-2) lodged a complaint under Section 3(viii), (ix)(x) and (xv) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereafter referred to as the Act) against the petitioners in the Special Court Kangra at Dharamsala. The Court directed Deputy Superintendent of Police, Headquarters Kangra, to inquire into the complaint and report. After inquiry, the Deputy Superintendent of Police submitted his report to the effect that the allegations in the complaint were false and no case was made out and recommended action against the complainant under Section 182 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereafter referred to as the Code), On objections filed by R-2 against the said report, the Special Court ordered fresh inquiry to be conducted by Deputy Superintendent of Police (Vigilance), Kangra, who submitted his report, which was returned by the Special Court, with the direction t