SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(HP) 43

C.R.THAKUR
RANIA – Appellant
Versus
KAMLA DEVI – Respondent


ORDER

1. Rania petitioner had filed a suit for possession by pre-emption of the land as detailed in the head-note of the plaint. A decree was passed accordingly in his favour by the Senior Sub Judge, Kangra at Dharamsala, on 29th April 1972. The operative part of the decree reads as under: " I therefore, grant a decree for possession by way of pre-emption of 11 kanals of land entered in Khata No. 58, Khasra No. 49 in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant. The sale price of the suit land measuring 46 Kanals 10 marlas is Rs. 15,500/- and accordingly the sale price of the decretal land measuring 11 Kanals comes out to be Rs. 3666.66 paise. The plaintiff has deposited Rs. 3100/- as pre-emption money and the remaining amount of Rs. 566.66 paise is directed to be deposited within one month of the passing of the present decree failing which the suit of the plaintiff shall be deemed to have been dismissed. The plaintiff shall get the proportionate costs of the suit".

2. The decree-holder filed an application purporting to be one under Sections 151 and 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure for correction of the judgment and decree, wherein Khata No. 38 has been wrongly inserted as kh




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top