C.R.THAKUR, R.S.PATHAK
BANSILAL – Appellant
Versus
KANSHI RAM – Respondent
2. On December 1, 1969 the landlord of shop No. 243, Chowk Bazar, Solan, filed an application under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") for the eviction of the tenant from the shop. On May 25, 1970 the Rent Controller framed a number of issues. Before any evidence could be recorded, the parties entered into a compromise on July 29, 1970 under which the tenant agreed to vacate the accommodation after one and a half years. A statement was made by the tenant before the Rent Controller setting out the terms of the compromise. On the same date, the Rent Controller passed an order of eviction in terms of the compromise. In the result the tenant was to vacate the premises by February 1, 1971.
3. On March 16, 1972 the tenant filed a suit for a declaration that the order dated July 29, 1970 of the Rent Controller was a nullity and he could not be evicted. The tenant also filed an
1. AIR 1974 SC 471 : (1974) 1 SCWR 219
2. Nagindas Ramdas v. Dalpatram Iccharam AIR 1973 SC 1311 : 1973 Ren CR 342
6. Bhagat Ram v. Lilawati Galib 12 AIR 1970 SC 794 : 1970 Ren CR 375
7. Ferozi Lal Jain v. Man Mal 10
10. Mangal Das v. Banka Mal 11 (1966) 2 All ER 981 : (1966) 2 WLR 1386
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.