SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(HP) 15

D.B.LAL
AMAR CHAND – Appellant
Versus
FIRM DASONDHI MAL KULJAS RAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.S. Thakur, for Appellant D.P. Sud, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT

1. This first appeal is di­rected against the decision of the Sub­ordinate Judge 1st Class, Kulu, wherein an application for restoration under O. 9, R. 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been dismissed. The appellant was de­fendant in a suit filed by M/s. Firm Dasondhi Mal Kuljas Rai for specific per­formance of a contract of sale of timber and in the alternative for recovery of damages in lieu thereof. The material dates during the course of hearing com­menced from 20-9-71 when after the plaintiffs evidence was over the defendant was asked to produce his evidence on 7-10-1971.

2. On 7-10-1971 the defendant asked for adjournment and 26-10-1971 was fixed. On 26-10-1971 again the defendant asked for adjournment and 24-11-1971 was fix­ed. On 24-11-1971 the defendant again asked for adjournment and the Court ordered him to pay Rs. 15 as costs and further ordered: "If evidence is not produced by that date the defence will be struck off as the case is oldest one." On 8-12-1971 the counsel for the defen­dant stated that he had no instructions. No steps were taken for the summoning of witnesses. Perhaps the costs were also not paid. Thereafter the court ordered: "I proceed ex par






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top