SURJIT SINGH
RAJESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH – Respondent
Surjit Singh, Judge (Oral):- Heard and gone through the record.
2. The applicant was taken into custody, as an accused, in a case, under Sections 395,323,342, 411, 412,414, 596 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, alongwith some other persons in four cases. He applied for becoming approver during the course of the investigation. Pardon was tendered to him.
3. The applicant has been in custody since February 2005. Trial has now commenced in all the four cases. Statement of the applicant, as a witness, in the course of the trial has been recorded in all the cases. He has now applied for his release (on bail).
4. The submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant is that keeping the applicant in detention for too long would amount to depriving him of his liberty, even though he is no longer an accused and as an approver also his statement has been recorded. He says that since the applicant himself has sought his release, it can be presumed that he does not have any fear, apprehension or even potential threat of danger to his life at the hands of those against whom he has deposed, by turning approver. His submission is that keeping an approver in detention for too long
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.