Kuldip Singh, J.

1. The Appellants are the successors-in-interest of Defendant No. 1 and have assailed judgment, decree dated 24.9.1999 passed by learned District Judge, Chamba in Civil Appeal No. 45 of 1994, affirming judgment, decree dated 8.8.1994 passed by learned Senior Sub Judge, Chamba in Civil Suit No. 13 of 1987 ( Dalhousie Court).

2. The Respondent No. 1 had filed a suit for declaration regarding property described in the plaint situate at Dalhousie, Tehsil Bhattiyat, District Chamba on the averments that her father Shiv Ram whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?

Mahajan was owner in possession of suit property. He died on 1.4.1969 and after his death the suit property has been inherited by the parties and their mother Smt. Raj Kumari widow of Shiv Ram Mahajan. It has been pleaded that Smt. Raj Kumari had also died intestate on 25.10.1985. The Respondent No. 1 has claimed that she is owner in possession of 1/9th share in the suit property.

3. The further case of Respondent No. 1 is that Amrti Lal Mahajan father of Appellants in connivance with Respondents No. 2 and 3 and to deprive other heirs of Shiv Ram Mahajan had executed family sett