KULDIP CHAND SOOD
Promod soni – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
Kuldip Chand Sood, J.
1. This petition UnderSection 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the orders of learned Additional District Judge, Solan, in Civil Misc. Appeal No. 27-NL/14 of 1999, dated April 19, 2000.
2. It appears, Lotus Computers", a partnership firm, was allotted Shed No. 12 in the Industrial Area at Baddi in the District of Solan by the Respondent-State of Himachal Pradesh in the Department of Industries through Respondent No. 3. The allotment was made by a letter dated April 3, 1995 and formal agreement deed (Exhibit D6) was executed on May 16,1995. At the relevant time, Mr. Anil Raheja, Y.P. Raheja and Mrs. Preeti Raheja were the partners of the Lotus Computers.
3. This firm, according to the Plaintiffs, was dissolved, by a Dissolution Deed, on March 28,1998. Underthe deed of dissolution, Y.P, Raheja and Mrs. Preeti Raheja left the partnership firm and Anil Raheja alone, it was agreed, was to carry on the business. Anil Raheja on April 6, 1998 opened a new partnership firm in the name and style of M/s. Image Maker (Petitioner No. 2) with Parmod Soni, Plaintiff No. 2 (Petitioner No. 1) as partner to do the business of readymade garments in the
1. R.V. Bhupal Prasad v. State of A.P. and Ors. (1995) 5 SCC 698
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.