KULDIP SINGH
Rachna Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Meena Kumari Sharma – Respondent
Kuldip Singh , Judge
This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed against order dated 3.10.2012 passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No.1 Kasauli in CMA No. 114/06 of 2012 in Case No. 122/1 of 2010.
2. The facts, in brief, are that respondent has filed a suit for declaration against the petitioner that respondent is the sole successor of deceased Rajinder Prakash Sharma co-owner in possession of the suit land to the extent of 1/3rd share land more specifically described in the plaint situate in mauja Garkhal, Hadbast No. 713. Rajinder Prakash Sharma was also co-owner in joint possession of land measuring 23 bighas 18 biswas and building constructed thereupon which respondent has succeeded after the death of Rajinder Prakash Sharma being his daughter and mutation No. 2711 dated 7.11.2007 of mauja Kasauli and mutation No. 869 dated 8.2.2008 of mauja Garkhal and showing the petitioner as absolute owner in possession of share of deceased Rajinder Prakash Sharma are also wrong, illegal, null and void and not binding upon the respondent. As a consequential relief, the decree for permanent prohibitory injunction has also been prayed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.