SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(HP) 252

KULDIP SINGH
Ramesh Chand – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent.:Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General.

JUDGMENT

Kuldip Singh, J.


The petitioner has suffered conviction in both the Courts below under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC, he has assailed judgment dated 21.2.2005 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Hamirpur in Criminal Appeal No. 06 of 2004 affirming judgment dated 3.6.2004 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Barsar in case No. 44-1 of 2004/45-II-2003.

2. The prosecution case in brief is that on 23.3.2004 PW-10 ASI Raj Kumar alongwith PW-8 H.C. Anil Kumar received information that accident had taken place, they reached Chakmoh. The statement Ex.PW-1/A of PW-1 Malu Ram under Section 154 Cr.P.C. was recorded. PW-1 stated that he was driver of Gypsy bearing No. HP-22-0029 and was on duty with Sub Divisional Police Officer, Barsar, PW-9 P.N. Banyal on 23.3.2003. They were coming from Deotsidh temple and were going to Chakmoh. At about 2.p.m. one kilometer from Chakmoh near Jaralmod a bus bearing No. HP-39-5685 came from the opposite side which was being driven in rash and negligent manner by the petitioner. PW-1 turned his Gypsy on the left side berm of the road but bus hit the Gypsy.

3. PW-1 further stated that on account of accident, the right side of the Gypsy was damag




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top