RAMABHADRAN
Rewa Shankar – Appellant
Versus
Narasinghji Maharaj – Respondent
Regular Second Appeal No. 10 of 1954 arises out of Civil Appeal No. 57/51 of the Court of the District Judge, Mahasu, whereby the decree for possession passed by the trial Court was set aside, while Regular Second Appeal No. 11 of 1954 arises out of Civil Appeal No. 71/51, whereby the decree of the trial Court, awarding a sum of Rs. 2,353/- as mesne profits was set aside. Since both the second appeals were inter-connected, they were heard together. This judgment will dispose of both of them.
2. Parties, with the exception of respondent No. 1, Thakur Narsinghji Maharaj through Raja Dalip Singh of Dhami, are descendants of a common ancestor, named Mannu. The plaintiffs case was that the ancestors of themselves and defendants 2 to 10 had settled in village Kanaur several years ago. They acquired 40 bighas and 15 biswas of land in village Kanaur and 120 bigh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.