SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(HP) 27

C.B.CAPOOR
Tula – Appellant
Versus
Sadh – Respondent


Advocates:
D.N. Vaidya and T.P. Vaidya, for Appellants; D.R. Choudhary, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT:- This is a plaintiffs second appeal and arises out of the appellate judgment and decree of the learned District Judge Mandi whereby the judgment and decree of the learned Senior Subordinate Judge dismissing the suit was affirmed.

2. Briefly stated, the plaint allegations were as below:

The plaintiffs were the owners of different parcels of land comprised in several Khasra numbers in Hadbast No.269 Ghogardhar, Tehsil Jogindemagar. For the last three,years the defendants have without any right been letting loose their cattle for grazing in the disputed land in the Kharif season thereby preventing the plaintiffs from sowing any crop in their land in that season .On 21-6-1917 an order was made by Shri H.W Emerson, the then Superintendent Mandi State, Recognizing that Hindu Gujars of villages Drangsira, Guma and Ner Kalari had a right to graze their cattle in the land situated in Ghogardhar subject to the payment of 50 per cent of the land revenue to the owners of the land and the supply of milk at the paraos (stages) Urla, Drang arid Jhatmgri. That order is not binding on the plaintiffs as Shri Emersorf had not power to make it and it has in particular ceased to be binding on t







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top