SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(HP) 282

TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Deepak Parkash – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. Rajnish Maniktala, Advocate.
For the Respondent: :Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral) : The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant/plaintiff against judgment and decree dated 22.4.2002 passed in Civil Appeal No. 21-P/1998 by learned Additional District Judge-II, Kangra at Dharamshala whereby he reversed the judgment and decree dated 24.11.1997 passed by learned Sub Judge 1st Class-I, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. in Civil Suit No. 151/1 990.

2. The appellant/plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the ‘plaintiff’) instituted a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction that the land comprised in Khasra Nos. 89/1 and 89/2 as shown in Tatima Ex.PW-1/B bearing Khata No. 72, Khatauni No. 158, situated at Mohal Gorat, Mauza Rajpur, Tehsil Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. was recorded in the ownership as well as possession of the plaintiff. The defendant was stranger to the said land and in September, 1990, the respondent/defendant (hereinafter referred to as the ‘defendant’) started raising a wooden shed over the suit land and also started digging it with the intention to lay fresh foundation. In alternative, the plaintiff prayed that if any part of the suit land was found underneath construction of the defendant, then



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top