IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J.
Trishal Devi & others – Appellants
Versus
Jai Kumar & others – Respondents
FAO No. 42 of 2007 a/w FAO No. 55 of 2007
Decided on: 12.09.2014
Driving Licence - Motor Accident Claims - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 149, Section 2(10), Section 2(21), Section 2(35), Section 2(47), Section 3, Section 10 - The court discussed the definitions of 'driving licence', 'light motor vehicle', 'public service vehicle', and 'transport vehicle' as contained in the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court interpreted the provisions of Section 3 and Section 10 of the Act, emphasizing the obligation on the driver to hold an effective driving licence for the type of vehicle being driven. The court also referred to relevant case law to support its interpretation and held that the endorsement of PSV was not required, and the owner did not commit any breach of the insurance policy, thereby affirming the liability of the insurer.
Fact of the Case:
The appeals were directed against an award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, involving a compensation claim and a challenge to the validity of the driver's licence and the liability of the insurer.
Finding of the Court:
The court upheld the Tribunal's decision to award compensation to the claimants and affirmed the liability of the insurer based on the interpretation of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Issues: Validity of driver's licence, liability of the insurer, and enhancement of compensation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of the definitions of 'driving licence', 'light motor vehicle', 'public service vehicle', and 'transport vehicle' as well as the obligations imposed on drivers under Section 3 and Section 10 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Final Decision: Both appeals were dismissed, and the awarded amount was directed to be released in favor of the claimants.
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J.
These appeals are directed against the award dated 29th November, 2006, passed by the Motor Accident Claims in MAC Petition No.24 of 2004 RBT 51 of 2005, titled Trishla Devi & others vs. Jai Kumar & others, whereby a sum of Rs.4,51,100/-alongwith interest at the rate of 6% per annum came to be awarded as compensation in favour of the claimants and against the insurer (for short the “impugned award”).
2. In FAO No.55 of 2007, the insurer has questioned the impugned award on the ground that the driver, namely, Jai Kumar of the offending vehicle was not having the valid and effective driving licence, the owner has committed willful breach of the terms and conditions of the insurance policy read with the mandate of Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short “the M.V. Act”). Thus, the Tribunal has fallen in error in saddling the insurer with liability to satisfy the award.
3. In FAO No.42 of 2007, the claimants have sought enhancement of compensation on the grounds taken in the memo of appeal read with the claim petition.
4. I have gone through the claim petition and perused the record. The Tribunal, after scanning the evidence, oral as well as documentary, rightly held the claimants are entitled to compensation to the tune of Rs.4,51,100/-, is just and appropriate compensation.
5. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal has rightly saddled the insurer with liability for the following reasons. This Court in judgment dated 25th July, 2014, passed in FAO No.54 of 2012, tilted Mahesh Kumar and another vs. Smt. Piaro Devi and others held that the driver who was having the effective and valid driving licence to drive the light motor vehicle portion of the judgment herein:
“10. I deem it proper to reproduce the definitions of “driving licence”, “light motor vehicle”, “private service vehicle” and “transport vehicle” as contained in Sections 2(10), 2(21), 2(35) and 2(47), respectively, of the MV Act herein:
“2. …..............
(10) “driving licence” means the licence issued by a competent authority under Chapter II authorising the person specified therein to drive, otherwise than a learner, a motor vehicle or a motor vehicle of any specified class or description.
xxx xxx xxx
“light motor vehicle” means a transport vehicle or omnibus the gross vehicle weight of either of which or a motor car or tractor or road-roller the unladen weight of any of which, does not exceed 7,500 kilograms.
xxx xxx xxx
(35) “public service vehicle” means any motor vehicle used or adapted to be used for the carriage of passengers for hire or reward, and includes a maxicab, a motorcab, contract carriage, and stage carriage.
xxx xxx xxx
(47) “transport vehicle” means a public service vehicle, a goods carriage , an educational institution bus or a private service vehicle.”
11. Section 2(21) of the MV Act provides that a “light motor vehicle” means a transport vehicle or omnibus, the gross vehicle weight of either of which or a motor car or tractor or road roller the unladen weight Section 2(35) of the MV Act gives the definition of a “public service vehicle”, which means any vehicle, which is used or allowed to be used for the carriage of passengers for hire or reward and includes a maxicab, a motorcab, contract carriage and stage carriage. It does not include light motor vehicle (LMV). Section 2(47) of the MV Act defines a “transport vehicle”. It means a public service vehicle, a goods carriage, an educational institution bus or a private service vehicle.
12. At the cost of repetition, definition of “light motor vehicle” includes the words “transport vehicle” also. Thus, the definition, as given, mandates the “light motor vehicle” is itself a “transport vehicle”, whereas the definitions of other vehicles are contained in Sections 2(14), 2(16), 2(17), 2(18), 2(22), 2(23) 2(24), 2(25), 2(26), 2(27), 2(28) and 2(29) of the MV Act. In these definitions, the words “transport vehicle” are
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.