Rajiv Sharma, J.

This regular second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of the learned District Judge, Una, H.P. dated 27.09.2014, passed in Civil Appeal No.85 of 2014.

2. Key facts, necessary for the adjudication of this regular second appeal are that the respondent-plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) instituted a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,20,000/- alongwith interest @ 12% per annum as compensation against the appellants-defendants (hereinafter referred to as the defendants for the convenience sake). According to the plaintiff, he is a businessman and doing work of interior decorator at Chandigarh. Village Bathari is his native place. He visits his village occasionally. Defendant No. 2 Sudesh Kumari, without any locus standi had filed civil suit bearing No. 176/2002 against the plaintiff and his brother Sh. Pritam Dass. The plaintiff and his brother had engaged the counsel and faced trial for more than five years. The defendant No. 2 got the civil suit dismissed as withdrawn on 1.5.2007. The defendants also instituted civil suit bearing No. 25 of 2007 for permanent injunction against the plaintiff and his brother Sh. Pritam Dass. On 3.4.2007