SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(HP) 451

RAJIV SHARMA
Ajay Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Poonam Bhardwaj – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant:Mr. C.N. Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Nemo.

JUDGMENT

Rajiv Sharma, J.

1. This FAO is directed against the judgment dated 16.3.2015, passed by the learned Addl. District Judge-I, Solan, H.P., in H.M. Petition No. 16-S/3 of 2010.

2. Key facts, necessary for the adjudication of this appeal are that the appellant-petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the appellant) has instituted a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, against the respondent for dissolution of marriage by decree of divorce. The marriage between the parties was solemnized on 2.10.2006 according to Hindu rites and customs at Hotel Prashant Inn, Sector 10, Panchkula, Haryana. One daughter, namely, Aasma Bhardwaj was born on 22.2.2008, who is in the custody of the respondent. The petitioner has given the instances of treating him with cruelty by the respondent as per details given in para 3 of the judgment. According to the appellant, these instances have put him under pressure leading to stress. The respondent had also filed complaint before the President AWWA Army Headquarter, New Delhi, whereby she has leveled false allegations of having illicit relations with Captain Mary Joy. These allegations have been leveled by the respondent against the


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top