RAJIV SHARMA
Ajay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Anita Devi – Respondent
Rajiv Sharma, J.
This appeal has been instituted against Judgment dated 29.10.2007 rendered by learned Additional District Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan in HMA Petition No. 6-N/3 of 2003.
2. “Key facts" necessary for the adjudication of the present appeal are that appellant has filed a divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, for dissolution of marriage. Marriage was solemnised between the parties in the year 1985 at Naha as per Hindu rites and customs. Relations between the parties remained cordial till October, 1988. However, after October, 1988, respondent subject him with cruelty. In December, 1988, appellant started living separately from the parents. In the year 1990, respondent left the house of the appellant. Thereafter, respondent left the house of the appellant on 8.2.2001 without his consent. Respondent deserted the appellant for a continuous period of about more than two years without any reason and cause. Petition was contested by the respondent factum of marriage is admitted. According to the respondent, appellant wanted to get rid of her. She was not able to conceive a child and hence, appellant intended to solemnise second marriage. Sh
Shobha Rani v. Madhukar Reddi reported in AIR 1988 SC 121
Samar Ghosh vs. Jaya Ghosh reported in (2007) 4 SCC 511
Pankaj Mahajan vs. Dimple Alias Kajal reported in (2011) 12 SCC 1
Vishwanath Agrawal vs. Sarla Vishwanath Agrawal reported in (2012) 7 SCC 288
Praveen Mehta v. Inderjit Mehta
Bipinchandra Jaisinghbai Shah versus Prabhavati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.