RAJIV SHARMA
Subhash Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Ranju Bala – Respondent
Rajiv Sharma, J.
This appeal has been instituted against Judgment dated 8.3.2007 rendered by learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Una, District Una, Himachal Pradesh in HMA Petition No. 26/04 RBT No. 19/05/04.
2. “Key facts" necessary for the adjudication of the present appeal are that respondent has instituted a petition against the appellant under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act for a decree of divorce. Marriage between the parties was solemnized at village Malahat, Tehsil and District Una, Himachal Pradesh as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. Family members of the appellant started harassing the respondent for bringing insufficient dowry. Parents of the respondent have gifted washing machine, sofa set etc. and jewelry worth Rs.1.50 Lakh. He also has taken Rs.1,10,000/- in cash from the parents of the respondent before marriage under the pretext of establishing independent business at Ghaziabad. It was claimed at the time of marriage that he was a Chartered Accountant and earning Rs.25,000 per month. However, she subsequently came to know that he was working in a private company. Appellant used to raise demand of dowry. The acts of the appellant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.