SANJAY KAROL
Shriram General Insurance Company – Appellant
Versus
Amarjeet Singh – Respondent
Sanjay Karol, J.
These appeals arise out of the same award, hence, are being disposed of together.
2. Petition, filed under the provisions of Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, stands allowed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-II, Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal), and in Claim Petition No.1-NL/2 of 2011, titled as Amarjeet Singh and others v. Pappu and others, claimants have been held entitled to compensation as under:
“Rs.9,37,000/- alongwith interest @9% per annum from the date of filing the petition till deposit of the awarded amount. Out of the total awarded amount petitioners No.3 and 4 shall be entitled to collect amount of Rs.50,000/- each while petitioner No.1 who is father of the deceased shall be entitled to collect an amount of Rs.1.0 lac. The remaining awarded amount shall be collected by the petitioner No.2 who is mother of the deceased.”
3. The Tribunal, while adjudicating the petition, framed the following issues:
“Issue No.1: Whether Lucky Arora died in a motor vehicle accident which took place on 25.10.2010 at about 5:45 p.m. Near Annapurna Hotel (Bhud Barrier) due to rash and negligent driving of respondent NO.1? O
Govind Yadav v. New India Insurance Company Limited
Munna Lal Jain and another v. Vipin Kumar Sharma and others
Reshma Kumari and others v. Madan Mohan and another
Kalpanaraj & others v. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
Sanjay Verma v. Haryana Roadways
Sarla Verma (Smt) and others v. Delhi Transport Corporation and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.