RAJIV SHARMA
Anu Devi – Appellant
Versus
Satnam Singh – Respondent
Rajiv Sharma, Judge:
This appeal has been instituted against Judgment dated 27.2.2015 rendered by learned Additional District Judge-II, Una, District Una, Himachal Pradesh in HMA No. 14/2011.
2. “Key facts" necessary for the adjudication of the present appeal are that the respondent instituted a petition under Section 13(1)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act against the appellant, for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce. According to the facts as set out the petition, marriage between the parties was solemnised on 6.5.2001 at Garhshankar (Punjab) in accordance with Hindu rites and customs. Parties lived together at Una and marriage was consummated. Appellant refused to maintain the marital sexual relation with the respondent to avoid pregnancy. Appellant used to pick up quarrels. She used abusive language against the respondent. Family members of the respondent were also humiliated. On 5.1.2002, appellant without any cause, left the matrimonial house. Respondent persuaded her to come back. She came back on 20.6.2006. Father of the respondent was serious in January 2009. However, appellant did not look after him. She did not attend the last rites of the Aunt of the re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.