IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Rajiv Sharma, Sureshwar Thakur, JJ.
Rajiv Sharma & another - Appellants
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Cr. Appeal No. 421 of 2012
Decided on : 14.12.2015
Justice Rajiv Sharma, J.
This appeal is instituted against the judgment and order dated 28.7.2012 and 2.8.2012, respectively, rendered by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Ghumarwin, Distt. Bilaspur, H.P., in Sessions Trial No. 15-7 of 2011, whereby the appellants-accused (hereinafter referred to as the accused), who were charged with and tried for offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 302 and 201 IPC, have been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 3,000/- each under Section 302 IPC. They were also sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay fine of Rs. 3,000/- each for the offence punishable under Section 201 IPC. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. In lieu of default of payment of fine, they were further ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two months each under both the counts.
2. The case of the prosecution, in a nut shell, is that accused Reshma Devi lodged missing report Ext. PW-26/A of her late husband Balak Ram (hereinafter referred to as the deceased) on 22.5.2011, at about 1:05 PM with Police Station Talai. Jiwan Kumar PW-1, brother of deceased was informed by his wife Meena Kumari (PW-21) on 21.5.2011 over telephone that deceased had gone to duty on 20.5.2011 but he did not return to his house after duty. Jiwan Kumar came to the Village Badgaon on 22.5.2011 from Ludhiana. On 23.5.2011 and 26.5.2011, he went to the Police Station to enquire about the whereabouts of the deceased. Balak Ram deceased was not found and then report Ext. PW- 1/A was lodged by Jiwan Kumar with the police on 28.5.2011. The deceased was part-time worker in Ayurvedic Dispensary, Dohak. On 20.5.2011, he had gone to attend his duties in the dispensary but did not return. Accused Rajiv Sharma used to visit the house of Balak Ram for the last one and a half year in the absence of deceased and his children. He used to serve liquor to the deceased. He was also having illicit relations with accused Reshma Devi, wife of the deceased. He had given one mobile phone to accused Reshma Devi. The mother of deceased, Juga Devi (PW-3) had deterred accused Rajiv Sharma few days back prior to the occurrence from visiting the house of deceased and thereafter accused stopped visiting the house. Accused Reshma Devi left the house on 20.5.2011, in the morning, in order to go to the house of her maternal Uncle at Thana Kalan to condole the death of her maternal cousin. She did not come back to the house on 20.5.2011 and she returned on 21.5.2011 at about 6:30-7:00 AM. Amrit Lal (PW-4) on 20.5.2011 after finishing his work was on his way to house and met Balak Ram at place Binkhiu Bawri at 7:00-7:15 PM and deceased had given three small packets containing the medicines as his son, namely, Munish Kumar, was suffering from dysentery. The deceased told Amrit Lal (PW-4) that he was to go to Proiyan with accused Rajiv Sharma. Amrit Lal (PW-4) handed over the medicines to the daughter of deceased, namely, Shalu. Balak Ram (deceased) also told his son Munish Kumar (PW-6) on 20.5.2011 while leaving the house that he would not return on that day and would go with accused Rajiv Sharma. Accused Rajiv Sharma got a bottle of liquor through Raj Kumar (PW-18) on 20th and proceeded towards Binkhiu Bawri. PW-16 Shakti Chand marked absence of Balak Ram (deceased) in the attendance register after 20.5.2011 and sent the absent report Ext. PW-16/A to Distt. Ayurvedic Dispensary. PW-5 Julfi Ram had seen accused Rajiv Sharma and Balak Ram on 20.5.2011 at about 7:30-7:45 PM at Binkhiu Bawri going towards Dam side and Balak Ram (deceased) contacted accused Rajiv Sharma on telephone of Thakuri Devi. The call did not mature and then he talked on mobile of Prem Lal. Balak Ram (deceased) worked till 6:30-7:00 PM on 20.5.2011 on the stone crusher of Thakuri Devi. Accused Reshma Devi visited the shop of Ranjana (PW-9) and purchased a pair of sandals and left by saying t
Anvar P.V. vrs. P.K. Basheer and others
Ajay Singh vrs. State of Maharashtra
Anil Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar
Ajit Singh Harnam Singh Gujral vrs. State of Maharashtra
Brajendrasingh vs. State of M.P.
Chattar Singh & another vrs. State of Haryana
Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of W.B.
Dandu Jaggaraju vrs. State of Andhra Pradesh
G. Parshwanath vs. State of Karnataka
Gambhir v. State of Maharashtra
Hanumant Govind Nargundkar vs. State of M.P.
Mohd. Azad alias Samin vs. State of West Bengal 2008(15) SCC 449 = JT 2008(11) SC 658
Majenderan Langeswaran vrs. State (NCT of Delhi) and another
Pannayar v. State of Tamil Nadu by Inspector of Police (2009) 9 SCC 152
Rama Nand and others vrs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Rishipal vrs. State of Uttarakhand
Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik vs. State of Maharashtra
Reddy Sampath Kumar v. State of A.P.
Ramreddy Rajesh Khanna Reddy vs. State of A.P.
Ram Gulam Chaudhary and others vrs. State of Bihar
Sevaka Perumal and another vrs. State of Tamil Nadu
State of Rajasthan vrs. Kashi Ram
Sattatiya vs. State of Maharashtra
Sathya Narayan vrs. State rep. by Inspector of Police
Shivu v. High Court of Karnataka, (2007) 4 SCC 713 and Shivaji v. State of Maharashtra
State of Goa vs. Pandurang Mohite
State of U.P. v. Satish [2005 (3) SCC 114]
Sukhram v. State of Maharashtra (2007) 7 SCC 502
Sunil Clifford Daniel (Dr.) v. State of Punjab (2012) 8 SCALE 670
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.