P.S.RANA
State of Himachal Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Baba Suraj Nath – Respondent
P.S. Rana, J.
Present appeal is filed against the judgment dated 23.12.2005 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.V Shimla in criminal case No. 100/2 of 2003/2002 title State of H.P. vs. Baba Suraj Nath.
Brief facts of the case
2. Complainant Surinder Kumar who was employed as Junior Assistant in the department of Tourism had deposited his salary in PNB The Mall Shimla. It is alleged by prosecution that complainant is unmarried and complainant met accused Baba Suraj Nath and disclosed the accused that complainant was suffering from mental tension etc. upon which accused assured the complainant to solve all his problems in life and also assured that he would be promoted in job. It is alleged by prosecution that accused demanded money from complainant and complainant had given three cheques to accused i.e. cheque No. 444247 dated 6.11.2001 amouting to Rs. 21000/- (Rupees twenty one thousand only), cheque No. 444248 dated 6.11.2001 amouting to Rs.21000/- (Rupees twenty one thousand only) and cheque No. 444250 dated 12.11.2001 amouting to Rs.50000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only). It is alleged by prosecution that accused defrauded the complainant to the tune of Rs. 92000
State of Kerala Vs. A.P. Pillai
Anjlus Dungdung Vs. State of Jharkhand
State (Delhi Administration) Vs. Gulzarilal Tandon
Bhagdomal Vs. State of Gujarat
Mookkiah and another Vs. State
State of Rajashthan Vs. Talevar and another
State of Rajasthan Vs. Shera Ram
Balak Ram and another Vs. State of U.P.
Allarakha K. Mansuri Vs. State of Gujarat
Raghunath Vs. State of Haryana
State of U.P. Vs. Ram Veer Singh and others
Arulvelu and another Vs. State
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.