SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(HP) 287

VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
M. C. Shimla – Appellant
Versus
Mathu Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Harminder Chandel, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Vivek Singh Thakur, J.

Respondent No. 1 in present appeal (herein after referred to be as plaintiff) has filed a civil suit against appellant Municipal Corporation, Shimla and proforma respondent No. 2 Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Shimla (herein after referred to be as defendants/defendants No. 1 and 2) seeking permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendants from taking away timber or any part of converted from deodar tree felled illegally from his land comprised in Khasra No. 1164 situated in Mauja Khalini Shimla. The suit was dismissed by the trial Court however, in appeal, learned District Judge decreed the suit with costs by passing a decree for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendants from removing wood from the suit land either themselves or through their agents.

2. In present appeal, defendant No. 1, Municipal Corporation, Shimla assailed judgment and decree passed by learned District Judge (Forest), Shimla. Appeal was admitted on following substantial questions of law:-

“1. Whether after taking over the management of Divisional Forest Office of the Municipal Corporation by the H.P. State Govt. vide Notification dated18.4.2006, the

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top