VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
M. C. Shimla – Appellant
Versus
Mathu Ram – Respondent
Vivek Singh Thakur, J.
Respondent No. 1 in present appeal (herein after referred to be as plaintiff) has filed a civil suit against appellant Municipal Corporation, Shimla and proforma respondent No. 2 Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Shimla (herein after referred to be as defendants/defendants No. 1 and 2) seeking permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendants from taking away timber or any part of converted from deodar tree felled illegally from his land comprised in Khasra No. 1164 situated in Mauja Khalini Shimla. The suit was dismissed by the trial Court however, in appeal, learned District Judge decreed the suit with costs by passing a decree for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendants from removing wood from the suit land either themselves or through their agents.
2. In present appeal, defendant No. 1, Municipal Corporation, Shimla assailed judgment and decree passed by learned District Judge (Forest), Shimla. Appeal was admitted on following substantial questions of law:-
“1. Whether after taking over the management of Divisional Forest Office of the Municipal Corporation by the H.P. State Govt. vide Notification dated18.4.2006, the
Anvar P.V. Vs. P.K. Basheer and others
Manager, Reserve Bank of India, Bangalore Vs. S. Mani and others
Laxmibai and another versus Bhagwantbuva and others
Khem Chand v. State of Himachal Pradesh
State of U.P. v. Nahar Singh (dead) & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.