IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA, JJ.
State of H.P. - Appellant
Versus
Rakesh - Respondent
Cr. Appeal No. 138 of 2015
Decided On : 04-01-2018
ND&PS Act - Acquittal - Section 20 of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - [Section 20] - The court discussed the provisions of Section 50 of the ND&PS Act and its applicability to the case. The judgment highlighted the importance of complying with the mandatory procedure under the Act and emphasized the need for clear communication of the accused's rights. The court referred to relevant case laws to support its decision to uphold the acquittal.
Fact of the Case:
The prosecution accused the respondents of possessing charas in violation of Section 20 of the ND&PS Act. The accused were found in possession of the contraband during a police check of a bus. The prosecution presented evidence, including witness testimonies and seizure memos. The accused pleaded not guilty and did not present any evidence in their defense. The trial court acquitted the accused, leading to the present appeal.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of the ND&PS Act, specifically regarding the personal search of the accused persons. It noted discrepancies in the statements of prosecution witnesses and emphasized the importance of clear communication of the accused's rights under Section 50 of the Act. The court concluded that the acquittal was justified and upheld the decision.
Issues: The key issue was whether the provisions of Section 50 of the ND&PS Act were complied with in conducting the personal search of the accused persons, and whether the prosecution had proven the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the failure of the prosecution to comply with the mandatory provisions of the ND&PS Act, particularly regarding the personal search of the accused persons. It emphasized the importance of clear communication of the accused's rights under Section 50 of the Act and referred to relevant case laws to support its decision to uphold the acquittal.
Final Decision: The court upheld the acquittal of the accused, concluding that the prosecution failed to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. The appeal was dismissed.
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J.
The present appeal is maintained by the appellant/State, laying challenge to judgment dated 28.10.2014, passed by learned Special Judge-II, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P., in Sessions Trial No. 78 of 2014, whereby the accused/respondents (hereinafter referred to as “the accused persons”) were acquitted for the commission of offence punishable under Section 20 of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as “ND&PS Act”).
2. The background facts, as projected by the prosecution, can succinctly be summarized as under:
On 21.12.2013, around 03:30 p.m. at Check Post Bajaura, police party was checking the vehicles. At about 07:00 p.m. a Volvo bus, having registration No. PB01-A-2205 of Indo Canadian, being driven by Gurmukh Singh came from Kullu side. The bus was intercepted by the police team and parked for checking. Head Constable Chaman Lal and ASI Mahant Ram alongwith the driver of the bus checked the same and during checking, when the police officials reached at seats No. 46 and 47, they found the accused persons sitting on the said seats by covering themselves with blanket. On being inquired about their names, they got perplexed. A red coloured bag was found, which was kept in between two seats, and the accused persons claimed the same. The bag was checked and it was found containing three packets. Both the accused persons were taken alongwith their bag to nearby Forest Check Post. Firstly, Head Constable Chaman Lal, in presence of witnesses, gave his personal search to the accused persons and nothing incriminating was found. Subsequently, the bag was opened in presence of the accused persons as well as the witnesses and three packets, which were wrapped with brown tape, were found and on opening the said packets stick and pane cake shaped charas was found. On weighment with electronic weighing scale, charas was found 2 kg and 50 grams. The recovered contraband was taken into possession and put inside a cloth parcel and the same was sealed with eight seals of seal having impression ‘H’ and the sample seal was handed over to ASI Mahant Ram. The case property was seized through a seizure memo after filling NCB-1 form. Rukka was prepared and sent through ASI Mahant Ram to police station for registration of FIR and consequent thereto FIR was registered. The spot map was prepared and the statements of the witnesses were recorded. The accused persons were arrested and the case property alongwith relevant documents and sample of seal was handed over to SI/SHO Lal Chand for resealing. Accordingly the case property was resealed with three seals having impression ‘T’. The facsimile of seal impression ‘T’ was taken separately on a piece of cloth and after filling the relevant columns of NCB-1 form, the case property alongwith the samples etc. was handed over to MHC Gian Chand for being deposited in malkhana. The case property alongwith the samples etc. was deposited in the malkhana and the relevant entry to this effect was made in the malkhana register. The case property was sent to FSL, Junga, vide RC No. 212/2013, for chemical analysis and the receipt thereof was handed over to Head Constable Gian Chand. Special report was prepared and the same was endorsed by the then Deputy Superintendent of Police, Shri Sanjay Sharma. The report of forensic analysis revealed that the sample contained extract of cannabis. The accused persons were found in exclusive and conscious possession of 2 kg 50 grams charas. After conclusion of investigation, challan was presented in the Court.
3. The prosecution, in order to prove its case, examined as many as nine witnesses. Statement of the accused persons were recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C., wherein they pleaded not guilty. The accused persons did not lead any evidence in their defence.
4. The learned Trial Court, vide impugned judgment dated 28.10.2014, acquitted the accused persons for the offence punishable under Section 20 of the ND&PS
Chandrappa vs. State of Karnataka
K. Prakashan vs. P.K. Surenderan
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.