SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(HP) 94

TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
MOHINDER KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
MAST RAM PATHAK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.S. Mehta, Adv., Mohar Singh, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.

The appellant is the complainant, who aggrieved by the order of acquittal passed by the learned trial Magistrate on 20.11.2017 in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short the 'Act'), has filed the instant appeal.

2. Taking into consideration the nature of the order I propose to pass, it is not necessary to delve into the facts in detail save and except that in the complaint filed by the appellant it was averred that the respondent/accused was a good friend and had requested for financial assistance of Rs.1,80,000/- which was required by him for running his business smoothly and properly. The complainant arranged this amount and handed over the same to the respondent. The respondent in turn issued cheque bearing No.523642 on 5.7.2014 amounting to Rs.1,80,000/- drawn at State Bank of India, Branch at Kali Bari, Shimla in favour of the complainant. Upon presentation of the cheque by the complainant in his bank Axis Bank, Ltd SDA Complex, Kasumpti, Shimla on 30.8.2014, the same was dishonoured on account of 'insufficient funds'. The complainant sent legal notice on 6.9.2014, but despite service thereof, the respondent/a























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top