SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(HP) 200

TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Jagdish Ram Thakur – Appellant
Versus
Champa Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Sanjeev K Suri, Adv., N.K. Thakur, Adv., Karan Veer Singh, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, J.

1. The appellant is the complainant, who aggrieved by the acquittal of the respondent in the complaint instituted by him under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short the ‘Act’), has filed the instant appeal.

2. Briefly stated, the case of the complainant was that the accused/respondent used to have business transaction with the complainant and taking advantage of such business transactions had purchased diesel worth Rs.4,55,000/- on credit and assured the complainant that the same shall be paid within few days. When the respondent was asked to settle the account, she handed over a cheque Ext.C-1 dated 27.12.2012 for the aforesaid amount on an account maintained by her with Punjab National Bank, which on presentation was received back dishonoured with the remarks ‘funds insufficient’. The petitioner thereafter issued notice to the respondent which was duly served upon her, yet she failed to make the payment, constraining the petitioner to file a complaint under Section 138 of the Act.

3. The complainant/petitioner in support of his contention, examined two witnesses. Thereafter, the statement of the respondent under Section 313 C













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top