TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Jagdish Ram Thakur – Appellant
Versus
Champa Devi – Respondent
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
1. The appellant is the complainant, who aggrieved by the acquittal of the respondent in the complaint instituted by him under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short the ‘Act’), has filed the instant appeal.
2. Briefly stated, the case of the complainant was that the accused/respondent used to have business transaction with the complainant and taking advantage of such business transactions had purchased diesel worth Rs.4,55,000/- on credit and assured the complainant that the same shall be paid within few days. When the respondent was asked to settle the account, she handed over a cheque Ext.C-1 dated 27.12.2012 for the aforesaid amount on an account maintained by her with Punjab National Bank, which on presentation was received back dishonoured with the remarks ‘funds insufficient’. The petitioner thereafter issued notice to the respondent which was duly served upon her, yet she failed to make the payment, constraining the petitioner to file a complaint under Section 138 of the Act.
3. The complainant/petitioner in support of his contention, examined two witnesses. Thereafter, the statement of the respondent under Section 313 C
Banna Reddy and others versus State of Karnataka and others
Hiten P. Dalal versus Bratindranath Banerjee
K. Prakashan versus P.K. Surenderan
Krishna Janardhan Bhat versus Dattatraya G. Hegde
Kumar Exports versus Sharma Carpets
M.S. Narayana Menon alias Mani versus State of Kerala and another
Rabindra Kumar Pal alias Dara Singh versus Republic of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.