CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Sunil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sohan Lal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J.
The present petition is maintained by the petitioners under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be called as "the Code") for quashing of F.I.R No. 21 of 2015, dated 28.1.2015, under Sections 420, 201 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station, Karsog, District Mandi, H.P.
2. Briefly stating the facts, giving rise to the present petition are that case FIR No.21 of 2015, dated 28.1.2015, under Sections 420, 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code was registered on the complaint of Shri Sohan Lal-respondent No.1 against unknown accused owner of SIM bearing No.7056053326, for the forgery of Rs.66,400/-. During the course of investigation, petitioners were arrested for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 420, 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Now, the parties have entered into a compromise, vide Compromise Deed, dated 28.2.2019, Annexure P-3, and they do not want to pursue the case against each other. Hence, the present petition.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that as the parties have compromised the matter, vide Compromise Deed (An
B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another
Inder Mohan Goswami and Another Vs. State of Uttaranchal & Others
Jitendra Raghuvanshi and others Vs. Babita Raghuvanshi and another
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another
Pepsi Food Ltd. and another Vs. Special Judicial Magistrate and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.