SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(HP) 261

CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Raju Ram Alias Raj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S. Palsra, Adv., J.K. Sharma, Adv., P.K. Bhatti, Adv., Raju Ram Rahi, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J.

The present petition is maintained by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be called as "the Code") for quashing of F.I.R. No.147/2017, dated 28.10.2017, under Sections 279, 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act, registered at Police Station, Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P.

2. Briefly stating the facts, giving rise to the present petition are that on 28.10.2017, at about 7:10 p.m, near Paprola Petrol Pump, respondent No.1 alongwith Brahmanand- complainant went to their home, a car bearing registration No.HP-33D-3376, being driven by the petitioner in a rash and negligent manner so as to endanger human life and personal safety of others and struck against respondent No.1 and received simple as well as grievous injuries on his leg and other parts of the body. On the basis of which, respondent No.2 reported the matter to the police and FIR was lodged. Now, the parties have entered into a compromise, vide Compromise Deed, dated 4.5.2019, Annexure P-1, and they do not want to pursue the case against each other. Hence, the present petition.

3. Learned counsel for the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top