CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Raju Ram Alias Raj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J.
The present petition is maintained by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be called as "the Code") for quashing of F.I.R. No.147/2017, dated 28.10.2017, under Sections 279, 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act, registered at Police Station, Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P.
2. Briefly stating the facts, giving rise to the present petition are that on 28.10.2017, at about 7:10 p.m, near Paprola Petrol Pump, respondent No.1 alongwith Brahmanand- complainant went to their home, a car bearing registration No.HP-33D-3376, being driven by the petitioner in a rash and negligent manner so as to endanger human life and personal safety of others and struck against respondent No.1 and received simple as well as grievous injuries on his leg and other parts of the body. On the basis of which, respondent No.2 reported the matter to the police and FIR was lodged. Now, the parties have entered into a compromise, vide Compromise Deed, dated 4.5.2019, Annexure P-1, and they do not want to pursue the case against each other. Hence, the present petition.
3. Learned counsel for the
B.S. Joshi and others vs. State of Haryana and another
Preeti Gupta and another vs. State of Jharkhand and another
Jitendra Raghuvanshi and others vs. Babita Raghuvanshi and another
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others vs. State of Gujarat and another
Pepsi Food Ltd. and another v. Special Judicial Magistrate and others
Inder Mohan Goswami and Another v. State of Uttaranchal & Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.