TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Dalip Singh Negi – Appellant
Versus
Ankit Gupta – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.
The appellant is the complainant, who aggrieved by the order of acquittal passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur on 23.08.2018 in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short the Act), has filed the instant appeal.
2. Taking into consideration the nature of the order I propose to pass, it is not necessary to delve into the facts in detail save and except that the appellant filed a complaint against the respondent/accused on the allegations that respondent/accused and his father were having business at Saharanpur and having cordial relationship. In the year, 2011, the father of the accused was ill and as such he sought help of Rs.50,000/ in January, 2011, for the first time which was paid to him. Thereafter repeatedly the complainant lent accused an amount of Rs.4,00,000/ from April, 2011 to November, 2011 @ Rs.50,000/ per month. However his father died and complainant did not approach him to refund the amount for one year and it was on 04.04.2013 that in order to discharge his liability respondent/accused issued a cheque for Rs.4,50,000/, which on presentation came to
Hiten P. Dalal vs. Bratindranath Banerjee (2001) 6 SCC 16
Kumar Exports vs. Sharma Carpets
Krishna Janardhan Bhat vs. Dattatraya G. Hegde (2008) 4 SCC 54
K. Prakashan vs. P.K. Surenderan (2008) 1 SCC 258
M.S. Narayana Menon alias Mani vs. State of Kerala and another (2006) 6 SCC 39
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.