SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(HP) 276

TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Mathia Ram – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Kulwant Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.

The appellant is the complainant, who aggrieved by the order of acquittal passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Rajgarh (Camp at Sarhan) District Sirmaur, H.P. on 28.09.2018 in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short the Act), has filed the instant appeal.

2. Taking into consideration the nature of the order I propose to pass, it is not necessary to delve into the facts in detail save and except that in the complaint filed by the appellant it was averred that the complainant had to recover Rs.50,000/ (Rupees Fifty Thousand) from the respondent/accused and in order to discharge his liability, the respondent/accused had issued a cheque, which was dishonoured for insufficient funds. The complainant sent legal notice on 29.09.2015, however, despite service thereof, the respondent/accused failed to repay the cheque amount, constraining the complainant to file the complaint under Section 138 of the Act.

3. On the basis of preliminary evidence led by the complainant, the respondent/accused was summoned and claimed trial by pleading not guilty.

4. The complainant examined himself as CW3, Khem Raj as CW 1 and S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top