CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Amarveer Alias Taru – Appellant
Versus
Roop Lal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J.
The present petition is maintained by the petitioners under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be called as "the Code") for quashing of F.I.R No. 03 of 2011, dated 02.01.2011, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 307 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station, Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P.
2. Briefly stating the facts, giving rise to the present petition are that on 02.1.2011, dinner party was going on in the house of the complainant, on the occasion of newly elected Gram Panchayat, Pradhan. Around 9:30 p.m., the complainant heard some noise and when he reached at the spot alongwith other persons, the petitioners, who were having weapons in their hands, gave beatings to them. Consequently, FIR No. 03 of 2011, dated 02.01.2011, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 307 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code, came to be registered against the petitioners. Now, the parties have entered into a compromise, vide Compromise Deed, Annexure P-2, and they do not want to pursue the case against each other. Hence, the present petition.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that as the parties have co
B.S. Joshi and others vs. State of Haryana and another
Inder Mohan Goswami and Another v. State of Uttaranchal & Others
Jitendra Raghuvanshi and others vs. Babita Raghuvanshi and another
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others vs. State of Gujarat and another
Preeti Gupta and another vs. State of Jharkhand and another
Pepsi Food Ltd. and another v. Special Judicial Magistrate and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.