TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Editor, Divya Himachal – Appellant
Versus
Sukhdev Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.
The appellants are the defendants, who have suffered a decree at the hands of the learned trial Court, which in turn, has been affirmed by the learned first appellate Court, constraining them to file the instant appeal.
2. The parties shall be referred to as the 'plaintiff' and 'defendants'.
3. The plaintiff filed a suit for libel claiming therein damages to the tune of Rs.10,00,000/-. It was averred that the plaintiff remained posted as District Ayurvedic Officer, Kangra at Dharamshala till March, 2007 and had many friends and relations in the said Division and he retired as District Ayurvedic Officer in March, 2007 and also being a permanent resident of Village and Post Office Dhaliara, Tehsil Dehra, District Kangra, H.P. enjoyed high respect and great reputation in the society. The defendants, who are the Editor, Publisher, Printer and Correspondent of 'Divya Himachal', respectively, on 31.01.2007, falsely and maliciously printed and published a news item under the heading of "SWARAN BHASAM KAND MAIN CHHEH NILAMBIT" and thereby projected that the plaintiff along with others has been suspended, whereas, no such order of suspension was passed agains
Carter Ruck on Libel and Slander (Manisha Koirala v. Shashi Lal Nair
G.Chandrasekhara Pillai vs. G. Raman Pillai
Kiran Bedi vs. Committee of Inquiry
Mehmood Nayyar Azam vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Om Prakash Chautala vs. Kanwar Bhan and others
Pandey Surindra Nath Sinha v. Bageshwari Pd..
Rustom K. Karanjia v. Krishnaraj M.D. Thackersey
Sewakram Sobhani vs. R.K. Karanjiya, Chief Editor, Weekly Blitz and others
Subramanian Swamy vs Union of India, Ministry of Law and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.