CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Ashwani Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J.
1. The present petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be called as "the Code") has been maintained by the petitioner for quashing of F.I.R. No. 87/13, dated 01.05.2013, under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of POCSO Act, registered at Police Station Dehra, District Kangra, H.P. alongwith all consequent proceedings arising out of the said F.I.R. pending before the learned trial Court.
2. Briefly stating the facts, giving rise to the present petition are that complainant/ respondent No. 3 filed a complaint against the petitioner, stating therein that on 30.04.2013, respondent No. 2 (prosecutrix) alongwith her grandmother had gone to attend the marriage and did not return back. As per the complainant, her daughter was kidnapped by the present petitioner. Consequently, FIR No. 87/2013, dated 01.05.2013, under Sections 363, 366, 376 of IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act, came to be registered against the petitioner. However, as per the case of the prosecution, the petitioner and respondent No. 2 had fled away and solemnized marriage and came back home in the month of August, 2014. Now t
B.S. Joshi and Others vs. State of Haryana and Another
Inder Mohan Goswami and Another vs. State of Uttaranchal and Others
Jitendra Raghuvanshi and Others vs. Babita Raghuvanshi and Another
Preeti Gupta and Another vs. State of Jharkhand and Another
Pepsi Food Ltd. and Another vs. Special Judicial Magistrate and Others
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Others vs. State of Gujarat and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.