CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Rajinder Prashad – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J.
The present petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be called as "the Code"), has been maintained by the petitioner for quashing of F.I.R No. 239/18, dated 07.12.2018, under Sections 279 and 337 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Theog, District Shimla, H.P., alongwith all consequent proceedings arising out of the said F.I.R., pending before the learned trial Court.
2. Briefly stating the facts, giving rise to the present petition are that on 07.12.2018, respondent No. 2/complainant alongwith his wife was coming to Shimla from his Village at Lahoti, around 1:00 p.m., when he reached near Dev Bhoomi Cold Store, Matiyana, a car, bearing registration No. HP-06A-1476, being driven by the present petitioner, came from opposite side and collided with his car, due to which, he sustained injuries. As per the complainant, the accident has occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the petitioner, consequently, F.I.R No. 239/18, dated 07.12.2018, came to be registered against the petitioner. However, now the parties have settled their dispute, vide compromise Deed, Annexure P-2 and in order to m
B.S. Joshi and others vs. State of Haryana and another
Preeti Gupta and another vs. State of Jharkhand and another
Jitendra Raghuvanshi and others vs. Babita Raghuvanshi and another
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others vs. State of Gujarat and another
Pepsi Food Ltd. and another v. Special Judicial Magistrate and others
Inder Mohan Goswami and Another v. State of Uttaranchal and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.