TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Puran Mal – Appellant
Versus
Birla Textiles Mills – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.
Both these petitions have been filed for common relief which reads thus:
(ii) That a writ in the nature of mandamus may be issued directing the respondent to extend the same benefits to the present petitioners also as have been extended to other similarly situated workmen as per the judgment of this Hon'ble Court in LPA No. 69/2008."
2. The issue of progressive deconcentration of population and economic activities within the National Capital Region (Delhi), in terms of Master Plan for Delhi 1962 and National Capital Region Plan-2001, came up for consideration before the Apex Court in W.P. (C) No. 4677 of 1985, titled as M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India and others., (1996) 4 SCC 750. Vide judgment dated 8.7.1996, , Apex Court inter alia held that certain industrial units, including that of the appellant set up under the name of M/s Birla Textile Mills, being a hazardous/noxious/heavy/large industry falling within the c
Govt. of W.B. Vs. Tarun K. Roy
Harwindra Kumar Vs. Chief Engineer, Karmik
Jagdish Lal Vs. State of Haryana
M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India and others
M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India and others.
M.C.Mehta Vs. Union of India and others
M/s. Rup Diamonds & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.
Maharaj Krishna Bhatt & Anr. Vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir
N.T. Devin Katti Vs. Karnataka Public Service Commission
S.S. Rathore Vs. State of M.P.
State of Karnataka & Ors. Vs. S.M. Kotrayya & Ors.
State of Karnataka Vs. C. Lalitha
State of Uttar Pradesh and others Vs. Arvind Kumar Srivastava and others
State of W.B. Vs. Debdas Kumar
U.P. Jal Nigam & Anr. Vs. Jaswant Singh & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.